Data Centers: Boom Amid Bottlenecks
Data centers have become the most capital-hungry asset class in commercial real estate almost overnight. Capital markets have embraced the sector, construction pipelines are full, and deal volume continues to set records. In 2025 alone, data center transactions surpassed $60 billion, fueled by AI adoption, hyperscaler expansion, and the global race to secure digital infrastructure.
Institutional acceptance is no longer in question. Securitized issuance tied to data centers has surged from less than $400 million annually pre-2021 to nearly $3.7 billion year-to-date in 2025, while cap rates have stabilized around 6.5%, reflecting investor confidence in durable cash flow and long-term demand.
Yet beneath the headlines, a more complicated reality is emerging. While demand remains real and structural, data centers may be scaling faster than the physical, environmental, and political systems that support them.
The result is not a classic oversupply story—but a market defined by bottlenecks.
Capital Is Abundant. Infrastructure Is Not.
From a pure demand perspective, the bull case remains intact. Data center REIT executives have emphasized that the sector is not in an oversupply state nationally, particularly in core markets where vacancy remains tight and pre-leasing is common. AI workloads are accelerating faster than forecast, and institutional capital continues to flow at scale.
But data centers are no longer just real estate. They are infrastructure.
AI’s growth has triggered what many analysts describe as a “real merge”—the convergence of commercial real estate, energy infrastructure, and capital markets. The value of a data center today is increasingly determined not by square footage, but by megawatts secured, grid access, and long-term power commitments.
Power availability has become the single greatest constraint. Grid interconnection queues are stretching years in many markets, and utilities are struggling to meet unprecedented demand. In response, federal regulators have begun allowing large technology companies to connect data centers directly to power plants—an extraordinary step that underscores how strained traditional infrastructure has become.
Water is the next pressure point. High-density AI computing requires advanced cooling systems, many of which are water intensive. In drought-prone or fast-growing regions, this has pushed data centers into direct competition with municipalities, agriculture, and residential users.
Analysts estimate up to $3 trillion in data center investment by 2030, but power and water access—not capital—are increasingly the gating factors.
Builders Are All-In—Perhaps Too Much So
The development frenzy is reshaping the broader construction landscape. Commercial builders are increasingly unwilling to build anything but data centers. Compared with office, retail, or even industrial projects, data centers offer scale, repeatability, and stronger economics.
That concentration cuts both ways.
On one hand, it accelerates delivery in a market desperate for capacity. On the other, it amplifies execution risk. Labor shortages, specialized equipment lead times, and rising development costs are all magnified when so much activity is chasing the same contractors, transformers, generators, and cooling systems.
S&P has flagged these dynamics explicitly, warning that long lead times, limited suitable land, rising costs, and power constraints are increasing execution risk across the sector. If delivery timelines slip—and many already are—capital sits idle, returns are delayed, and underwriting assumptions begin to erode.
Community Resistance Is No Longer a Footnote
Perhaps the most underestimated risk in the data center boom is local opposition. In 2025, U.S. data center cancellations surged, driven by community resistance tied to power usage, water consumption, land use, and limited local economic benefits.
Unlike warehouses or multifamily developments, data centers generate relatively few permanent jobs once operational. For many municipalities, the trade-off between infrastructure strain and community benefit is no longer an easy decision.
This has real consequences for investors. Markets that once welcomed hyperscale development are now imposing moratoriums, enhanced environmental reviews, or stricter zoning requirements. From an underwriting perspective, entitlement risk is beginning to resemble that of energy or utility infrastructure projects—not traditional industrial real estate.
As NAIOP research underscores, sustainability is now a material financial risk, not just an ESG consideration. Energy sourcing, water strategy, emissions, and community engagement increasingly influence whether projects move forward at all.
Where Demand Is Outpacing Supply—and Where It Isn’t
Despite the friction, demand continues to outpace supply in several established corridors. Northern Virginia remains the epicenter of global data center demand. Phoenix, Dallas, and Atlanta continue to absorb capacity, though power constraints are tightening. Secondary markets with strong fiber networks, supportive utilities, and faster entitlements are emerging as beneficiaries of spillover demand.
At the same time, risk is rising in markets where development is racing ahead of infrastructure certainty. Projects that assume future grid upgrades, speculative land plays without committed power, or phased builds dependent on unapproved water solutions carry materially higher risk.
In today’s environment, “supply” is not square footage delivered—it is megawatts delivered, on time, with regulatory and community buy-in.
Underwriting Is Evolving—And It Has To
Traditional CRE underwriting models struggle to capture these realities. Data center valuation is rapidly shifting away from rent-per-square-foot metrics toward power-centric underwriting, where secured megawatts, PPAs, and lease structure drive value.
Key underwriting questions now include:
- Is power fully contracted or merely planned?
- Are water rights secured for both current and future phases?
- How does rapid technology obsolescence align with long-dated leases?
- What happens if regulatory or community opposition delays expansion?
Moody’s notes that lenders are responding by tightening structures—often requiring construction debt to be fully amortized within initial lease terms, reducing reliance on residual value assumptions. Modular and prefabricated construction is also gaining traction as a way to shorten delivery timelines and reduce execution risk.
Boom, Yes—but With Friction
There is no question that data centers have entered the mainstream of institutional real estate. Securitized issuance, stabilized pricing, and record transaction volumes confirm that the asset class is here to stay.
But the next phase of growth will not be defined by capital availability. It will be defined by infrastructure realism.
The winners will be those who treat data centers not just as buildings, but as infrastructure assets embedded in complex energy, water, regulatory, and community systems. The losers may be those who assume that demand alone can overcome physical and political constraints.
The data center boom is very real. So are the bottlenecks. And navigating them will require more discipline, patience, and underwriting rigor than the hype might suggest.
A Trusted Guide in Commercial Real Estate
Coldwell Banker Commercial® provides Commercial Real Estate Services from Property Sales and Leases, to Property Management. Learn how our expansive network of Independently Owned and Operated Affiliates and Real Estate Professionals use their in-depth knowledge of the local market and industry trends to help businesses and investors navigate the complexities of the commercial real estate landscape.
